In detail such a process evolves like that:
An AU process is always an actual action, he concentrates on contemporary views and on a social situation and reacts to the apathic and isolated public. These social-aesthetic form, seems in the beginning a little bit trivial, transports to the interacting public a new dimension to see things and to react. In the same time it confirms the necessity of the collaboration with the peoples, that are next to us. The contents that I use are real, without deception (Fotos, articles or parts of papers and magazines, etc.). The result should be a "question mark", an alternative. This initiative, which is very mobil, stops when we do not react together (colaborate).
The phases or impulses that should initiate the evolution of the social-aesthetic process are:
I. Initiation
The CoWaPro-AU-sheet (Contemporary-Wanted-Problem-AU-sheet) is developed and elaborated by the utilist in a inside-room. After that it is offered to the public outside.
II. Social developement
The action outside - the CoWaPro in touch with the public X outside. The reactions are fotographed and filmed. After the interaction the peoples are asked to give their names and adresses, so that they can be invited to the ExAcDi (Exhibition-Action-Diskussion) three month later.
III. Confrontation - Analysis
Now the utilist confronts the two phases, that means, that the utilist confronts his own CoWaPro-AU-sheet with the, from the public elaborated, CoWaPro-AU-sheet. The phases are visualized in a new big-format grafic and analyzed. So its possible, with this examination, with an own commentary, to reactivate a better and much concreter Interest for the choosen topic (problem).
IV. Ex - Ac - Di
The metamophosis, means the symbolic change of the existing, aesthetic form of the CoWaPro-AU-sheet, bordered and visualized in a big white linen (Environment AU). This big white linen is not only the border of the Raum AU (room AU). When we step on it we become witness of our involvement (footprints) at the alternative produced in phase II. That means that there is once more a social developement. New possibilites and new interests can be generated, public X meets now public Y (the public not present in phase II) and new encounters and examinations are produced between them - the discussion follows.
After these process the utilist takes distance of the position of author and regiseur and expect the reaction on the "question mark".
